But hold on. Gerardo Aldana, a researcher at the University of California Santa Barbara now claims we've got it all wrong. Aldana does not take on the predictions, only the math. He argues that the numerical value (known as the GMT) used to convert the Maya calendar to the Gregorian or modern calendar is off by as much as 50 to 100 years.
"I am all for challenging conventional wisdom," said Allen Christenson,
So, if there is no error in the calculation of the date, does that mean that the doomsday predictions are right? Not according to Dr. Christenson, "It's just nonsense. The same sort of things were said about Y2K."
Dr. Christenson bases his conclusion on decades of academic study of the Maya culture, art and religion. He is fluent in several Mayan languages. What's more, he published what some consider the definitive translation of the Popol Vuh -- something of a Maya Bible.
He explained that modern man seems much more concerned about December 21, 2012 than the Maya. "There is the sum total of one ancient Maya text that refers to the 2012 date." And it comes from a fairly minor monument found among Maya ruins. The translation of that monument indicated that on that date a particular god will descend. "To be perfectly frank, a god of endings and destruction." But he added, "Also a god of rebirth and creation."
In the Maya religion is the world is constantly dying and being reborn. A Maya priest explained to Dr. Christenson there is death at harvest time and at every sunset when the western horizon is splashed with blood. And at the winter solstice in 2012 there will also be a type of death and rebirth. But he added, "There's no indication whatsoever that they thought everything would end permanently after 2012. There are a lot of
Still, movies like "2012" and all of the doomsday websites do not upset Dr. Christenson. Of course he believes firmly that they are wrong. But from the hype, he hopes some good will come. "I hope that people will
No comments:
Post a Comment